Donny-
it should be noted that this is not exactly RMP's
>definition of "IntPoVs." In LILA, he clearly writes about the IntPoVs of
>non-western cultures (like Native Americans) and he describes "insanity"
>as abandoning your cultures IntPoVs and setting up your own, personal
>IntPoVs. Pirsig uses the metaphor of a person in a movie theater.
Where is this passage in LILA?
I think it's kind of strage that Pirsig would put intellectual abour
sociological and then say that that an individual can have their own
IntPoV. I'd like to examine this closer. However, without having done so
I so far agree with your and Bo's "Prooving" standard. Since of course the
notion of "proof" is only valid in a subject/object logic, I can see better
why this same logic would have to BE the Intellectual level. Hmmm... I
think I'm starting like this SOLAQI idea.
It's all good,
Rick
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:39 BST