<Magnus-
This is also a tempting topic but I stick with Art. Actually, I just read
your forum post about the "MoQ doesn't need to be Fuzzy" (I don't know why
I missed it before, I thought I had read them all). I thought it was a
nice tie in to the Art topic because of your idea of "common language". If
I read correctly, when you got down to the end, the book LILA was an
IntPoV, supported by the SoPoV of Language and furthermore by the
OrganicPoVs of paper and ink. But how would this system apply to say...
music? Classical music and jazz may be IntPoVs, but they are not supported
by a SoPoV like "language", only Inorganic sound waves. I haven't given a
great deal of thought to this yet (I just read your paper and hey, it ain't
the topic of the month) but I think there are some provacative possibilites
down this road. How bout you Mag?
All good,
Rick
At 01:06 PM 11/22/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi Squad
>
>I suggest again,
>
>What does Pirsig mean when he said:
>Morality = Reality = Quality.
>
>I doubt we'll ever have a coherent and intelligent
>discussion again if we don't nail this down first.
>
> Magnus
>
>
>homepage - http://www.moq.org
>queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
>unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
>body of email
>
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:40 BST