Greetings,
You are indeed right Horse and I'm a great fan of the assumption which constitutes Ockham's Razor.
However there is a slight shift of emphasis in your answer.
It would seem that everything is evolving to higher complexity/quality except for our explanations
which evolve to greater simplicity/quality. The fact that we allow our explanations to be an
exception to the rule is fascinating, wouldn't you agree?
At least at the intellectual level, quality and complexity are not always one and the same. I see no
reason why, if morality can go either way in one level, that the same shouldn't be the case in other
levels. This questions the whole hierarchical morality of the MoQ. Not the morality itself I should
add, just the hierarchy.
Struan
------------------------------------------
Struan Hellier
< mailto:struan@shellier.freeserve.co.uk>
"Like all young men I set out to be a genius.
Fortunately laughter intervened"
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:54 BST