Hi guys and gals
Roger wrote:
> I encourage each of you to now answer the following same
> questions IN YOUR OWN WORDS OF CHOICE:
Mmm, fun!
> Q1) Define DQ as succinctly as possible
DQ is the answer to the question: "How can anything become?"
Without it, everything would be completely static. Not static as in
unmoving, but as in predictable.
> Q2) Define the QE, in terms of your preceding definition if possible
The QE is the source of two SPoV, each one being the subject from its point
of view. All QEs are more or less dynamic.
> Q3) Define sq, in terms of the above two def's if possible
SQ is the answer to the question: "How can anything be?"
Without it, the patterns from one QE wouldn't live to see the next.
As you can see, I'd like to reorder Q1-Q3 so that DQ and SQ are
defined first. Then, the QE can be defined in terms of them.
> Q4) Explain how the levels emerge in the above terms
Mu. I don't think the levels "emerged". Troy's rock a few months ago
comes to mind. The lunar geologists on Apollo 17 looked at rocks formed
billions of years ago, but they read them like an open book. To them,
they were intellectual patterns, just as the ink in a book.
> Q5) Explain what "all is evolving toward" in your preceding terms
Not toward, away from static patterns, but still dependent on them.
Magnus
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:54 BST