ROGER'S THOUGHTLESS RESPONSE
Ian wrote:
>"I think a lot of confusion arises from equating the intellectual level with
>thought itself."
>This leads me to ask the following : How is thought classified by MOQ? or
>Which level comprises thought?
Roger:
I have noticed the same mistake in several threads lately. It is usually a
HUGE mistake to try to equate any THING or behavior to a level. I tried this
at length for a long time before realizing its futility. Virtually
everything you can name or describe other than DQ is a collection of
patterns....and a collection comprised of multiple levels. Tieing
shoes...... Thoughts ...... education...... government...... etc. Even a
subatomic particle is as much an intellectual pattern as an inorganic one.
In fact, I wonder if anybody can think of anything that the rest of the group
can't define as a collection of multi-level patterns?????
Rog
PS.... Thx for the great dialogue all. Incredible to see possibly the best
week ever in the MD follow one that seemed.... well...... a bit off course.
The new members are Dynamic and fresh and bring out new patterns in us all.
But I got behind, and am now just content with my new pattern of enjoying the
writing.....
SMOOCH!!!
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:05 BST