Dear MOQuers,
Sorry to rehash what must be an old post by now, but I feel I have something
value to add:
ROBERT:
By saying DQ is non-phenomenal, are you only saying DQ can't be conceived
(understood)? Or are you also saying also saying that DQ can't be perceived
(observed) directly?
If you go with the latter, I merely misunderstood you and it will save me a
lot of re-reading!
ME:
DQ can be percieved by its results; But Quality cannot be directly
percieved;
in fact, it cannot exist without perceptible properties. But, these prop-
erties are what make up everything in the universe, so you won't hear me
complaining! ;-)
Regards,
Curtis.
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:09 BST