Hi guys,
David B. wrote:
>DQ is above and beyond all the
>static levels. You know, its the first split in the MOQ; static and
>Dynamic Quality.
>...the intellectual level
>is the most free and has the greatest chance to respond to DQ. It just
>seems like a rather obvious contradiction to say that any static level
>is dynamic. Wouldn't it be better to say that the intellectual level of
>static patterns is the most complex and rapidly evolving level?
Do any platypi get stepped on when we say that "Quality is One, Undivided"?
This means that any distinction between "static" and "dynamic" is ultimately
false, though useful. Things and thoughts (reality) this way is MORE OR LESS
Dynamic, or static (-stable-), if you like?
Quality as shades, degrees, a continuous spectrum... rather than a dualism.
Does this sound good?
Rich
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:09 BST