Bo and Avid,
Bo wrote:
> First of all I applaud your words (to Walter Balestra) in another post:
>> What worries me is that all of this discussion could have been made without
>> Pirsig's theory too. All you are arguing about is Reality vs. Observation
>> period. Not about MoQ. MoQ is a different set of Metaphysics and it should
>> be built in order to see how it functions. These little building stones are
>> formulated experiences of quality, SPQ, static patterns of quality. So please
>> if someone here cares to shift from our SOM to MoQ, please do, but it
>> requires a shift.
> I agree unto hysterics.
After reading this short respons of Avid three times, I thought it best to leave it
at rest. Now mr. Skutvik comes with it again and not only that ... unto hysterics!
It is probably because of the height of my IQ, but can you please explain these
words. Is it adressed to the whole Reality vs. Observation-thread or just to me.
It somehow seems to easy to me to break into a thread like this and give a
qualification like that, without being more explicit or participating with the other
writers which do find this subject important.
Walter
Ps Welcome back Bo! ;-)
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:10 BST