> Curtis Burisch wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone...
> >
> > This morning, a thought occurred to me.
> >
> > Assume I am making plans to do something-or-other. The plan-making
process
> > is definitely DQ.
>
> David: I would disagree. unless plan making itself is new to you.
> we've all made plans.
Avid:
True we have a routine of plan making [therefore a SPQ is there suggesting
the best known way to plan].
> >(esp. if it's something I've never done before, like
> > sky-diving).
Avid:
There is no way to plan something you never did before and you have no idea
about. The moment you have an idea about it, you can start planing, but this
would be suggestions and guesses about it, not necessary of high quality
[therefore far from being DQ].
> David: this might make it dynamic (or add a dynamic quality to
> something we already know how to do)
Avid:
not necessarily, the dynamism is your approach to the subject, not in the
subject of your choice. You can be as rigid while approaching something new,
while creative [dynamic] approaching some well chewed subject.
Definitely not David [Curtis?]:
> >Does that mean that when I actually jump out the airplane, it's
> > SQ? I must admit I am confused on this issue.
Avid:
You will experience its quality immediately, will you be able to improve it?
not so sure.
> David:
nope. the jumping out of the plane could put you into a
> dynamic state. (for lots of reasons....fear, excitement, the newness
> of the experience)
Avid:
You will be dynamic indeed, but too much dynamism of the body [joints
muscles, bones, can be fatal, very low quality indeed, for low quality
experiences let me suggest the stove instead.
David:
>> back to lurk mode (or maybe not)
Avid:
It is definitely more dynamic to write then to lurk, however the quality of
the experience may vary.
David:
> Shalom
Avid:
SHALOM SHALOM
David:
> btw - "purity" has come up a few times (often bashed for the things
> that have been done in purity's name) - just need to say that i think
> bashing purity because of what's been done in it's name is like
> bashing god because of the spanish inquisition or for what abusive
> priests have done to young boys. it's people who did those things.
> and imo, people can always find something to twist (purity, faith, any
> belief) if they want to.
Avid:
Wonderful point.
Yes there are times when terms are put to rest, to let connotative meanings
drop of them [I have a very good Art example for that but it would upset
Platt and Dan].
But here I meant something more profound then that.
Purity derives materialism, and both derive from essentialism, which is
derived [somehow] from SOM.
But in MoQ the context [the impurity] is ALWAYS PART OF THE PRIMAL QUALITY
EXPERIENCE. Experience of quality is OF THE SITUATION AS A WHOLE/ It is a
holistic [not a essential] experience, therefore I suggest that in MoQ
purity loses its meaning [sleep on it first, object latter]
>
>
and don't forget to be gentle
Avid
icq 6598359
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:10 BST