> Dynamic Quality is completely simple and always new.
is it? from the human point of view, isnt dynamic quality acceptance of all
static pattern of quality at the same level as the new patterns of quality?
the book (from my point of view) highlights dynamic quality as that we all
experience from time to time when presented with something new and exciting.
from the human level, dynamic quality as a way of life is not just those
things that are new, it is also looking on the things that are old as if
they are new.
> Dynamic Quality is freedom from static patterns.
only if it is not new. i should also say that this is down to individual
perception, who is to say which pattern is static and which is not. this,
more than anything, i feel, leads to dynamic quality being undefinable,a dn
no matter how many of these little things people send, you will never define
it. dynamic quality is dynamic quality. that is as close as you can get,
as it is beyond our intellectual comprehension as our intellects are created
by it. if you dont see this, think of science, we can only ever model
nature, we can never perfect it. the created can never understand the
creator.
Regard
Rich.
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:14 BST