okay, i see your point(s) i apologise to brian. (for the comments rather
than the sentiment, i stick to that)
sorry brian.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Dotterweich <Dotterweich@dfhaia.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: MD A very safe position.
> Richard get a life. Dont be such a loudmouth. Instead of instantly taking
a defensive stance why not question yourself first. Your gonna have to
realize someday that the "quiet" people may simply have no respect for you.
Try earning it.
>
> Your just another example of slightly (very) veiled name calling.
>
> I have to agree with Brian. I have been a "silent" observer due to
curiosity by one of my favortie works. I refused to participate with a
group of self righteous extremists. I favor active and receptive discussions
that favor a collaboration of ideas not a continuous endgame of "I am right
and you are wrong" which seems to be the dominating atmosphere of many of
these discussions. I won't completely denounce the moq discussions but some
of you are really missing the whole point.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On Behalf Of Richard Edgar
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 3:11 PM
> To: moq_discuss@moq.org
> Subject: MD A very safe position.
>
>
> if you seek meat then go to the butchers ... in other words, if you wont
to
> know something, write. if you have no questions and no opinions, then you
> have no right to chastise us as you do.
>
> it's a very safe position you hold as a silent observer. sitting
causiously
> at the side of the road, too scared to stick his neck out but all the time
> critising those usind the road. a very safe position indeed.
>
> we see you brian chamerlain, but we ignore the criticism of the silent
> because what right do they have to complain?
>
> a very safe position indeed!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian Chamberlin <BrianChamberlin@JCN1.com>
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 10:28 PM
> Subject: RE: MD (Truth = Quality)?
>
>
> >
> > So I have quietly been observing the conversations back and forth:
Exactly
> > what is the point of theses "discussions"??? Between the slightly
veiled
> > "name calling", and the insiped lack of trust in your selves to see the
> > difference in black or white or perhaps the shades of grey, its hard to
> find
> > any meat at all here!!
> >
> > Occasionally (pardon if this sounds bitchy) there has been a grain of
> light
> > or too...But for the most part...It leaves you guessing...Silent
Observer
> >
> >
> >
> > MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
> > Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> > Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
> > MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
> >
> >
>
>
>
> MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
>
>
>
> MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
>
>
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:14 BST