Rich,
You wrote
>I sympathize with Roger's mention of being tired of rehashing what we
>already (think) we know about Pirsig's philosophy. Fun as it is, I am sad to
>say that not yet has one person (to my knowledge - if so then PLEASE put it
>one the website) attempted to:
>
>COMPLETELY
>
> &
>
>CLEARLY
>
>outline, or explain Pirsig's philosophy, NOT as they personally would like
>it to be, or think it 'should' be, but AS they believe Pirsig himself meant
>it to be. The obvious query is: why don't you do it, and stop bitching?
>Well, I'm trying.
No, actually I have tried and I have also pointed this out to you before.
I haven't succeeded because I can't do it on my own because I have several
problems with Pirsig's philosophy that I'm unable to resolve without
discussing it with others, and I have been unable to get anyone else to focus
on these questions. If you choose to ignore my efforts that's up to you,
but please don't try to make out that you are the only one
Diana
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:38 BST