Platt Holden wrote:
> Hi Group:
>
> A review of recent posts reveals that most of us currently participating in
the
> discussion are believers in a reality “out there,” independent of us. The
nature
> of this transcendent reality varies:
>
> To Ken Clark it’s a “function” or “process.”
>
> To Jonathan Marder it’s “forces.”
>
> To David Lind it’s “too big” for us to understand.
WAIT A MINUTE - DID I SAY REALITY WAS SOMETHING "OUT THERE" -
INDEPENDENT OF US? HMMMM....DON'T REMEMBER DOING SO. THOUGHT I JUST
COMMENTED ON THE IMMENSITY OF IT - NOT WHETHER IT'S INDEPENDENT OF US.
PLEASE BE CAREFUL IN STATING MY VIEW FOR ME. YOU DIDN'T GET IT RIGHT
THIS TIME. I UNDERSTAMD WHERE YOU MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN THE IDEA I SEE IT
AS AN "IT" (OUT THERE - SEPERATE FROM ME) - BECAUSE I DESCRIBE IT AS
"IT" - BUT THIS IS JUST LINGUISTICS.
THAT'S ALL.
Shalom
David Lind
Trickster@postmark.net
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:40 BST