> I must admit, I'm slightly confused; (it's late and I'm tired); are we
taking the fact that the boy couldn't walk until he witnessed examples of
walking as proof that walking isn't innate? - but has anyone made such a
supposition? (that walking is 'innate' as against 'acquired'). I'm not sure
that walking is considered to be qualitatively different to other, more
recent skills such as reading, or even driving, (or, for that matter,
talking), etc.....?
Am I missing something? - I look forard to debate.
regards,
ppl
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:48 BST