Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darwin and Lamarck

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Oct 16 2000 - 19:38:15 BST


Jonathan, in order to answer properly I split your post in some parts...

----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan B. Marder <jonathan.marder@newmail.net>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darwin and Lamarck

> KENNETH
> >My idea is, if memes are blocks of info and they
> >are selfish likegenes they
> > will do everything to propagate themselves [snip].
>
> Let me add that the combination of meme + ENVIRONMENT must propagate. In
> that respect, memes are like any other pattern. Patterns can only
> persist if their propagation is encouraged (a tautology).

<< That is just the point I gonna make in the topic I will present to you
all.
In my opinion patterns (meme and environment) don 't have to be encouraged
to propagate themselves. They can propagate from their " own case ".
There is something strange in the way memes act, if we take it for granted
that they are selfish in nature, like genes.
It is time I think Jonathan to present my article, don 't you agree !?

Regards,

Kenneth

( I am, because we are)

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:48 BST