Hello everyone
Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
>
> And why must we keep DQ concept free !? I don 't understand !
> May DQ not be driven by some kind of biological/ evolutionary/...etc
> motor...!?
> That sounds like some God to me...
Hi Kenneth
Your question goes straight to the heart of the MOQ and of Niels Bohr's
framework of complementarity. We might say Dynamic Quality is the
evolutionary motor yet one we cannot conceive of. We might say Dynamic
Quality is God but not a God we can talk to or pray to or imagine in any
way at all. The harmony we see all around us is our own static quality
harmony and not the harmony of God; of Dynamic Quality. There is nothing
at all that can be said of Dynamic Quality without disturbing it into
something else. If you haven't yet, you should read the Subjects,
Objects, Data and Values paper. That answers your question quite well,
much better than I am able to.
>
> And Dan, I have to admit...you got me thinking...
> Thanks
Oh you are certainly welcome, and thank you too!
Dan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:50 BST