In a message dated 5/16/2001 9:21:42 PM Central Daylight Time,
HisSheedness@aol.com writes:
> this is my first post everyone, just to let you konw. ive been reading all
> of the stuff for about a week now. anyway, personally i think zamm and
> lila
> have an esoteric appeal- just simply knowing that you can see the world in
> some way that not very many other people can. a textbook organized into
> chapters i think would take away from the book's artistic appeal. pirsig
> chose this way to present his ideas and i think that's how they should be
> taken. when he was talking about the divisions of the moq, didn't he
> mention
> something about the highest level being 'a code of art?' That's why i
> think
> he presented the moq as just that- a novel, a code of art with the theme of
> moq as highest pattern of evolution maybe. thanks for reading this.
> rasheed
>
Welcome to you and to other recent newcomers. Yes, others have mentioned the
"code of art" and no one has it figured out yet.
Jon
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:16 BST