Dear Glen,
Please call me Wim, not William.
3dwavedave wrote 7/7 11:13 -0500:
"The trap that Phaedrus, and many of us, falls into is trying to
immediately apply metaphysical insights to solve all
philosophical
problems without development of the other philosophical systems.
That
murder, death penalties, rape and pillage, and meat eating are
'the
nature of being or reality' the current metaphysical facts of our
experience, is undeniable."
I agree with you that "as experience differs, philosophies should
too". Maybe we should try to distinguish better between
metaphysics (the MoQ and its interpretation, which we could
strive to agree on) and its applications in other philosophies
(including libertarianism), which will stay different as long as
we don't know each other's experience good enough to create
together a philosophy that "fits" with both sets of experience.
As we are both from a Western culture, that should not be
impossible, only time-consuming.
If you still think it worthwile to communicate with me, please
suggest a (re)starting point.
With friendly greetings,
Wim Nusselder
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:27 BST