Dear Elizaphanian
Fabulous post.
Platt, Squonk,
YOU'VE GOT IT! - I think that's full summary intent of Lila.
- Pirsig has issued us a challenge :
"Intellect has a defect in it"
When I came to this group, that is what I was hoping to find - an
exploration of the (unstated) question Pirsig has presented us with :
Intellect has a defect in it - What comes next?
We are being challenging to consider the philosophy of 'morals'.
The highest level isn't 'intellect' - we need to think outside of the
box. Failing that, we need at the very least to allow for the
possibility, the respect for, I'd like to say - the appreciation,
that true 'wisdom' may not be so easily quantified as intellect would
like to imagine.
I sure would like to see a group like this tackle this problem.
>I think now, especially, morals need to be considered in whatever w bush's
>cabinet decides to do.
'High 5' to Rasheed !
Squonk : Any suggestions on where I can find more on the "Science of
Morals"? (thanks in advance)
Love,
Tanya
. . . seems I need to re-read the chapters in the 20's. . .
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:30 BST