Hello!
Quality is not defined at all.
It is concept free, and it's workings may not produce good.
God is a synonim for Quality and a static description of God is an analogue
of Quality.
If you expect something that means you have never been sufficiently surprised
yet!
Static quality is identified in relationships and is not merely subjective.
Static objective patterns are real too! But even these exist in relation to
Quality.
All the best,
Squonk.
In a message dated 10/17/01 9:12:49 PM GMT Daylight Time, cozens@ntlworld.com
writes:
<< Subj: MD Reality and Quality
Date: 10/17/01 9:12:49 PM GMT Daylight Time
From: cozens@ntlworld.com (cozens)
Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
If quality is defined as the pre-intellectual perception of reality
and that reality is dependant on an individuals perception, why
does it follow that quality is good or God ? isn't it just relative
to what that individuals expectation of reality was.
>>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:34 BST