Hi Wim, John, Horse:
Wim wrote:
> Thanks a lot, John, for passing on 9/11 9:18 +0100 Noam Chomsky's
> talk about "The New War Against Terror". Despite its horrendous
> length, it's worth reading.
> Does even this not change your mind even a little bit, Platt?
> Noam Chomsky argues his case quite a bit more eloquently and
> supported which much more rich detail than Horse did. You won't
> like it, but can you deny the general drift of his message?
Chomsky is well known here as a left-wing radical who systematically
(and cleverly) employs lies and half-truths to bolster his Marxist
agenda. He is, in effect, a spokesman for the Taliban and Al-Qaeda by
proposing that 1) America is responsible for the root causes of the
attack on the Trade Center, and 2) America has done worse to others.
Since that is the "general drift" of his message, I certainly do deny it.
I hope this site which is supposedly dedicated to the MOQ doesn't
become a platform for the full text of speeches by other than forum
members. Frankly, I'm surprised that Horse as moderator let the
Chomsky diatribe pass. Should he also permit entire speeches by
Bush, Blair and other Western leaders to be reproduced here? I don't
think so.
Anyway, I find Horse a lot more eloquent than Chomsky and would
prefer reading what he has to say any day.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:37 BST