Hello John,
I have got a few things from this forum; it's a good forum, and i like to
chip in when i feel i can.
Sadly, i feel i missed it's dynamic heyday - maybe i should do a bit of
archive trawling?
The MOQ certainly does not need my defence, but there are those who helped me
in the past, and if i may do like wise then that's equitable.
I'm a bit of a cheeky chappy at times, not so much arrogant.
Although i do become a bit furrowed of brow when wind bags blow off about
digital thingies and global whatsits.
Plenty of books there my friend; is there enough paper to accommodate all of
it?
Squonk.
In a message dated 11/13/01 7:40:17 AM GMT Standard Time,
beasley@austarnet.com.au writes:
<< Subj: Re: MD Beauty & DQ
Date: 11/13/01 7:40:17 AM GMT Standard Time
From: beasley@austarnet.com.au (John Beasley)
Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Squonk,
You may consider yourself enlightened and others not, and it is possible you
could be right.
However, two things give me cause to doubt that.
Firstly, you continue to contribute to this forum. If the MOQ is of such
high quality, it does not need your defence. If you are such an authority on
where to find quality, why do you hang around? Certainly not to assist
others, it seems.
Secondly, the mystic tradition asserts that awareness of quality is
associated with compassion, not arrogance. Your approach seems much closer
to what Wilber describes very aptly as "a great number of the Infobahn males
are digital predators - egocentric computer warriors that couldn't give a
damn about intersubjective cooperation and mutual recognition. So much for
global consciousness."
Sadly, it seems to fit.
John B
>>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:37 BST