Hi all,
I just wanted to throw in a bit of support for this:
Rog:
> ...These and a hundred other threads have been explored and to a great
extent
> lost in the flow of the MD and MF due to the overwhelming lack of summary
and
> static latches.
>
> Think about it... we could use the MF as a static latch to summarize
> arguments down to their basic essentials, recording who was on each side
of
> the discussion, and what the points were that they made. Those feeling the
> summary was not balanced could also summarize there issues. Later, we
could
> reference and springboard off of these established foundations. New
members
> could be encouraged to read these summaries before restating all the
> arguments. Updates could be added in the future to the thread summaries
as
> we further explore new angles in future months. etc, etc.
>
> I think that this would allow us to accomplish Magnus' goals of capturing
> various interpretations or branches of the MOQ, and it would eliminate a
> bunch of our concerns with editorial censorship. Thoughts?
I would very much welcome something along these lines. It would enable us to
really push forward the (interesting) intellectual challenges.
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:41 BST