MD mutability

From: enoonan (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2001 - 05:26:17 GMT


>===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
>
Hello everybody,
They survive because of their ability to change, a flexible nature to adapt to
the environment.
(the couple scared of technology in ZAMM seems to me to represent people who
fear change. I sort of had a distast for technology before but as T. Robbins
says--- something is good because it is good not because it is natural)
Now that I think about it Osama kind of seems to have the same problem- fear
of change.
 
A very crude test of intelligence they use with infants is to measure novelty
detection. So perhaps it *something* to detect change, a learning capacity or
maybe more the courage to explore it.

Erin

Hey Roger,
>
>"What do the patterns of higher quality have that those of destruction,
>decay
>and disorder don't?"
>
> I really want to just say Quality here but I'd be doing your question a
>disservice. One thing that strikes me is that they survive. Patterns of
>destruction are by their nature fleeting in that once they destroy, they
>fade away. Patterns that have quality may appear to be destructive at first,
>but when they last, one might start admitting that they have survivability
>and thus have quality in and of themselves.
> Quality emerges from survivability. That can be said to be a tautological
>truth :-). If I didn't have enough quality in my genes in order to survive
>and say it, It would never have been said.
> Rob
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
>[mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On Behalf Of RISKYBIZ9@aol.com
>Sent: December 12, 2001 9:30 PM
>To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>Subject: Re: MD Overdoing the dynamic
>
>
>To: Marco, John, Jonathan, Erin, Platt, 3WD, Gerhard and others living on
>the
>edge of chaos
>From: Roger
>
>So, the Q is:
>
>"What do the patterns of higher quality have that those of destruction,
>decay
>and disorder don't?" That is to me the fundamental question arising out of
>the
>MOQ. I have lots of thoughts, but none conclusive yet. What do you guys
>think?
>
>I am reviewing Marco and John's comments and preparing some of my own, but I
>want to encourage more particaipation. I would be glad to summarize and
>record highlights of the discussion, as long as you all can bear with my
>slow
>pace during the working week (I am of course busy lecturing and doing genius
>stuff, lol)
>
>Man-of-many-credentials,
>Roger
>
>
>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
>Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
>
>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
>Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:41 BST