In a message dated 1/23/02 12:27:30 PM GMT Standard Time,
elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com writes:
<< PS: Does anyone get the M theory or Superstring theory,
does anyone know if it implicates something for philosophy in general and
the MOQ specifically? What would that be?
>>
Hi Davor,
String theory is kind of interesting in that it reduces reality to geometry.
Geometry in multi-dimension, but basically its more modelling using logical
relationships?
I have been pondering this, see what you and the group make of it:
1. Time is DQ. It is the source of reality.
2. The first static pattern produced by DQ is Space. We may widen this term
and say, Space = relationship.
Relationships evolve in relation to DQ itself, and one such relational
pattern is the concept of time. But this is an intellectual concept distilled
from the changes in relationships; changes created by DQ.
I feel this is so simple and elegant if one can 'see' it?
On the other hand, i may be vastly mistaken.
So the value chain goes like this:
DQ (Time) creates static patterns (relationship)
The value of relationships is changed by DQ (Time) and when we look back and
think about the changes we inadvertently imagine we feel the motion of time.
The value of our own patterns is changing in relationship to DQ, so our image
of personal identity is part of the unfolding activity, and this leads to
confusion regarding the nature of time.
Time used as a concept of measurement is an intellectual tool - primarily to
determine truths.
Time in its quality sense is the motivation for the level of value in
relationships.
String theory views reality in terms of geometrical relationships; it is
therefore static and serves scientific truth and not value.
All the best,
Squonk.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:47 BST