--- 3dwavedave <dlt44@ipa.net> wrote:
> If in a commonsense way the moral systems of the MoQ
> are:
>
> inorganic ='s "laws of nature"
> organic ='s "laws of the jungle"
> social ='s "the law"
> intellectual = [Blank]
>
> Why did Pirsig not tie some name like these to this
> level? Or did he
> somewhere and I miss it? But if he didn't what are
> some of the
> possibilities? The best candidate?
>
> 3WD
If I can jump in on this, my candidate is
intellectual = Reason
which in this context I look on as the ability to
consciously create laws, hence (as Erin notes) it is
about freedom.
And, of course, it harks back to the Church of Reason.
- Scott
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive -
> http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the
> instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:51 BST