Bo,
I've clued in to our form of disagreement. You use
logic to solve the problem we agree on whereas I use
paraconsistent logic. The problem is "isn't it an
error to put MOQ in Q-intellect?". I agree. The Bo
solution is to add a "growing notion" of a new level.
I think it's an error because it is logical. Why not a
10th level and skip 5,6,7,8,9? Well it's a next level
because it's logical. So your form for solving the MOQ
in Q intellect is to use "logic." My solution is to
apply paraconsistent logic. Allow 2 realms of parallel
thinking where each exposes the other truth. If we
think of DQ and sq paraconsistently, the problem of
MOQ in Q-intellect goes away. The problem is I can't
explain it to you logically because then I wouldn't be
paraconsistent. I think this is why you have such a
hard time with being understood. You are trying to
express a concept that language can not accomadate. So
my problem has been to find a new language, I suppose
the "art code" that you talk about is it. So I wonder
if my expression here is accurate of your specific
opinions about this narrow question? It seems you can
help me in this fight to find a solution of some sort.
Angus
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Got something to say? Say it better with Yahoo! Video Mail
http://mail.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:51 BST