Bo
OK, based of your emphatic "YES'S" is sounds like to have correctly
stated your position with reguard to SOL and the intellectural level.
Now if you would help me with a few other points maybe I'll understand
the unswerving defence of your SOLAQI theory in the face of so little
support here or in Pirsig's work.
> The inorganic-biological levels as "objects" and social-intellectual as "subjects"
> is a way to subsume SOM under QM's rule and it works, but has its weakness...
Focusing just on the intellectual level;
1. What are these weakness ? And how does your theory correct them?
2. What are benefits of this interpretation?
3. What are the pitfalls?
4. In the balance is this then the best solution?
3WD
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:53 BST