Wim
> Trying to get more agreement is not only realistic, but also necessary to keep (at
> least) me motivated to go on participating.
I was commenting primarily on how this is done, not the necessity of
trying to come to some agreement. But these agreements are now more on
an individual basis. Now as we each keep refining and tuning our own
understanding of the MoQ it becoming more or less stable based on our
dialogue with others. Less stable you go away or become a resident
skeptic. More stable you go eventually away or become a resident
defender. Until and unless a sufficent critical mass of those whose
worldview and actions reflect the MoQ is established I don't think a
'wiki' manual would be of any use, except to the few who contribute to
it and even then not that much, because it would lack the input of a
broad range of critical thinkers.
3WD
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:56 BST