Re: MD MOQ Credibility

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 02:28:31 GMT


In a message dated 3/4/02 9:24:48 PM GMT Standard Time, pholden@sc.rr.com
writes:

<< Subj: MD MOQ Credibility
 Date: 3/4/02 9:24:48 PM GMT Standard Time
 From: pholden@sc.rr.com (Platt Holden)
 Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
 Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
 To: moq_discuss@moq.org
 
 Hi All:
 
 From the April issue of "Discover Magazine" comes the following
 excerpted description of how the universe was created, followed by a
 quote from physicist Alan Guth, author of the Inflationary Theory.
 
 "Quantum theory holds that a vacuum, like atoms, is subject to
 quantum uncertainties. This means that things can materialize out of
 the vacuum, although they tend to vanish back into it quickly.
 Theoretically, anything -- a dog, a house, a planet -- can pop into
 existence by means of this quantum quirk, which physicists call a
 vacuum fluctuation. All matter plus all gravity in the observable universe
 equals zero. So the universe could come from nothing because it is,
 fundamentally, nothing."
 
 Says Guth, "It is rather fantastic to realize that the laws of physics can
 describe how everything was created in a random quantum fluctuation
 out of nothing, and how over the course of 15 billion years, matter could
 organize in such complex ways that we have human beings sitting
 here, talking, doing things intentionally."
 
 "Fantastic" hardly captures the implausibility of the physicist's
 explanation. From nothing--zero, zip, nada--magically appears the
 universe. By comparison, resurrection from the dead appears infinitely
 reasonable, and the MOQ positively explodes with explanatory power.
 
 Platt >>

Hello Platt,
There is great working in the undifferentiated methinks? ;)
You have been thinking about beauty for some time; it may be of some help to
consider beauty as a static pattern which is illuminated by Quality?
That which is dynamic has grace and it is grace that illuminates that which
is beautiful?
Leonardo da Vinci attempted to 'capture' grace in static image.
Symmetry is beautiful only in that is illuminated by grace.
Maybe the dismissive nothing physicists speak of is Grace itself...
In producing static patterns it appears to be a masculine strait to
rationalise, and a feminine trait to the mystical?
Our mythos does appear to be paternal, divisive, fractured and eager for
posterity?
Humanity may be beautiful but i often wonder how graceful it is?

With best wishes,
Squonk. :-)

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:56 BST