Hi Platt!
PLATT:
Says Guth, "It is rather fantastic to realize that the laws of physics can
describe how everything was created in a random quantum fluctuation
out of nothing, and how over the course of 15 billion years, matter could
organize in such complex ways that we have human beings sitting
here, talking, doing things intentionally."
"Fantastic" hardly captures the implausibility of the physicist's
explanation. From nothing--zero, zip, nada--magically appears the
universe. By comparison, resurrection from the dead appears infinitely
reasonable, and the MOQ positively explodes with explanatory power.
RISKY:
What part of the MOQ do you see as contradicting science's current best
theory? Or do you see the MOQ as supplementing the theory? If this is the
case, how so?
Curious,
Risky
PS -- I realize Mr Guth's quote offered no explanation for the organization
of complexity, so I am assuming your comments are focused on his theory for
the origin of the universe. Please correct me if I am wrong though.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:57 BST