Hi all,
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Squonk
> I was trying to introduce i light tone into a somewhat heavy area?
Sorry for being so beligerent. I mean to be light but i end up on the
wrong end every time. Sorry.
so,
"the theories regarding the total number of fundamental particles in the
universe
may actually exceed the number of fundamental particles themselves?" So?
ironic maybe but not any sort of valid scientific argument.
"If there is only one particle in the universe why do we have at least two
theories explaining fundamental particles: a. There is one. and b. There
are
more than one." Human ignorance and dilusion to quote Wonyho.
I perhaps misrepresented my view. Science is a study of human perception.
By fact i meant Absolute Truth, not observable phnenomoinm (sic). Science
is based soley on observable phenominom, not a clear perception of
"Reality". I apologize if i misrepresented a beautiful visulization of
exsistance with a static model of interpretation. For me, single electron
theory makes quality make sence, rather than "circle inside circles" i can
see fractals of quality that make up exsistance. SOM disappears becaue all
things are only of one particle (you and i are connected fundementally, but
seperated by Apriori space and time).
Science is no more a vision of Reality than anyother philosophy.
"We may also postulate that its behaviour, although fundamentally dictated
by
quality is mediated via a little red pixy called Charley, who lives in a
delightful old cottage beyond the fragrant flower meadows of Aventtakloo,
where a shimmering rainbow meets the glittering shores of Time immortal."
I recognize your substitution for god for a pixy, but whats your point? So
exsistance is determined by quality (any objections?), what role does
Charley play and what does his exisistance mean for MoQ, and how does your
visulization get rid of mediation via Charley?
We are talking visulization not absoulte truth. Are pirsig's boxes of
quality more explanitory than my model, are they more real? if so, i
appologize for burdening you with an inferior idea, otherwise, i find my
idea to be eloquent and verifiable by my experience. what else is truth?
Elliot
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:11 BST