Hi all,
Don't worry, just two quick things
John:
> It depends on what you mean by evidence. I would assume
> all experience of dynamic quality is 'evidence' in some sense, without
> thought
Elliot:
An example of the problem of words. Evidence is a static pattern that can
only exsist within thought. it is data. There is something you can gain
without thought, something deep inside that words dont conform to, i dont
know what to call it. Perhaps some static pattern called personal history,
the pattern of self, the pattern of experience (but not memory). i dont
know, maybe somewone else has the word, or maybe no one knows what im
talking about. (but it sounds like atleast john does).
and about this reality=quality thing, i get the idea people mean exsistance
= reality. Using the buddhist metaphor of the ocean and the wind of
ignorance, i suggest that quality is not the ocean (which cannot be put
into words) but that quality is the interaction between the wind and water.
Sub-Ob only delt with the ripples, which is why MoQ is a deeper and broader
description, but there is still the expansive indescribably ocean of the
One Mind, which there is no way to talk about. Thats my 2 cents.
Elliot
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:12 BST