Greetings gert,
Gert:
> some other visualization..
> http://home.wish.net/~gjpeeters/MoQ/
> Is it correct? What should be changed?
Elliot:
Your visulization corisponds with the ideas of MoQ. But is it correct?
Pirsigs (or maybe someone else came up with it) requirements for
correctness are :internal consistancy, empirical verifibility and economy
of explanation. I would alter this slightly, rather than economy i would
use eloquence. Eloquence to me is of a higher quality than simple economy,
although eloquence certainly does include economy.
Thus your visulization is a good summary of the book, but when you visulize
the world, do you see boxes stacked on boxes? Pirsig uses the word pattern
which does not seem to be included in your visulization. So, i think mines
better (na nan nan na na), although yours is "correct" and more easily
understood than mine.
Heres an example of a single electron visulization (and you'll see why i
think it helps visulize the MoQ univrse better):
http://www.d.kth.se/~d96-era/fractal.gif
Elliot
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:12 BST
