sorry to write so much today and especially about responding to myself,
--On Friday, April 26, 2002 2:17 PM -0500 ehallmark@Macalester.edu wrote:rr
> Heres an example of a single electron visulization (and you'll see why i
> think it helps visulize the MoQ univrse better):
> http://www.d.kth.se/~d96-era/fractal.gif
This visulization is static in that i considers time a spacial dimension.
Thus DQ doesnt show up in it. From the POV of an individual percieving
time, this visulization would be like this:
There is a tree, and the tree has two dimensional leaves. on each leaf
there is a force of birth (DQ) which spawns smaller trees all over each
leaf. the leaves of those trees do the same and onward. Each genre of
tree is a static level. I see DQ as a frothing white substance spawinging
these static patterns, leaving them behind, and continuing to spawn more.
The nature of each tree would be dependant upon the nature of the leaf
which spawned it. Thus the greatest freedom is to decend from the trees
and wrap yourself in the froth of DQ. I hope this doesnt all seem to
arbitrary to everyone, but DQ as a box just doesnt strike me.
Also, to gert's visulization ( http://home.wish.net/~gjpeeters/MoQ/ ) I
would add something. First, i believe Pirsig mentions the chaos level,
which would be on the bottom, and bellow that i personally would put
another level called "intellect". Just because the MoQ is just a static
pattern spawned by the intellect, and to put inorganic or chaos on the
bottom imples a sort of abloute truthism which i dont think Pirsig was
going for.
So many letters today, sorry, sorry sorry,
Elliot
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:12 BST
