Hi Elliot and Erin,
Excuse me butting in like this, but the following caught my eye:
ELLIOT
My defintion of uniqueness is "different
in every aspect".
I think that your definition is unworkable.
Something "different in every aspect" would, in MoQ terms, it would be
PURE DYNAMIC QUALITY.
I maintain that such a beast would go completely unnoticed -
pragmatically, it would not exist.
You need some recognisable feature to recognise something in the first
place. Its uniqueness may stem from just one single piece of
non-conformity among hundreds of non-unique features.
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:12 BST