Elliot,
>Elliot: Thus, although your
>definition works well in the world we can talk about, when we get down to
>the nature of the world before distinctions, to say something is uniquely
>yours (or mine or his) is to error. This conversation started as a
>question by you not understanding that. Do you see what we were getting
>at? or do you even care anymore (that was a while ago).
>
Well I do care but I am not sure if my position has changed at all. I am
still mulling over what Angus wrote, the image he sets up makes my head spin,
so it may take awhile to set in.
But my original statement was
ERIN: I see how the separateness may be an error but still not clear how this
shows uniqueness is an error
So with "uniquely mine" -- the separation or "mine" seems to be a problem but
what is wrong with the unique part?
Erin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:12 BST