Bodvar wrote:
I wrote something about the said thread, but dropped it (will only keep
the Joao notes at the end). However there is an issues that bothers me
greatly: The Algeria case where democracy allowed the fundamental
Muslims to (be able to) abolish democracy and there was a military
coup d'etat to prevent this. This wasn't - and still isn't democracy - but
somehow better than teocracy ....or ...David? Can't this be compared
to Fortuyn's cause? Wasn't that your idea Sam? To pre-empt a future
Netherlandic majority to "abolish" homosexuality ...and start changing
law in a "sharia" direction?
DMB:
I see what you're saying, but I think the analogy doesn't hold simply
because Holland in not a colony, but Algeria was. Also if forced to choose
between a theocracy and a military dictatorship... I'd f*ck the bull.
(thanks, 3WD)
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:15 BST