Hi erin,
>But to me the clear distinction from the biological level to
>the social level is one from objective to subjective.
>I personally don't see anything subjective in ants.
Elliot:
well, you wouldnt now would you. if you saw something subjective about ants
then you'd have to be one (our objective observations of ant society is why
i brought up the notion of ant mythos, which seems absurd i know). I agree
to this point which is why i say when we discuss the social we can only
discuss the social which is subjective to us, the one which also includes
the intellectual level.
But, the levels are patterns of motion (because what makes all this up is
only movement on the quantum level). lead moves in inorganic ways, lizards
in biological ways, ants in social ways and human consiousness in
intellectual ways. Also, lead values gravity, Lizards perpetuation of self,
ants expansion and efficency and intellect peace of mind. thats how i got
what i have as a view point, thats all.
Elliot
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:19 BST