Hi Wim,
I am a little confused if we are disagreeing at all.
1)I realized that I inserted "(social)" in the wrong spot from what I meant
2)I had written this so long ago that I tried to go back and refresh my
memory where you said "collective morality was the unconscious not social to
you" (which was the purpose of my question).
I couldn't find you saying that anywhere. I either misinterpreted you
or just couldn't find it.
WIM asks me about this quote:
ERIN: 'On another note you had said that collective morality was the
unconscious
not social to you. I am not clear why it can't be a collective conscious
(social) and a collective unconscious that creates a collective morality. I
think the importance of a collective morality is the recognition the
interconnectedness of everything--- you can get this internally and
externally
ERIN: I see in retrospect that I (social) was inserted at the wrong spot.
Let me try again with (social) inserted at the right spot.
I am not clear why it can't be a collective conscious and a collective
unconscious (social) that creates a collective morality.
I think the importance of a collective morality is the recognition of the
interconnectedness of everything--you can get this internally and externally.
WIM: The dichotomies of collective/individual
>and internal/external are irrelevant to the way in which I primarily
>distinguish between the social and intellectual levels of (static) quality.
>Both social and intellectual patterns of values have collective AND
>individual aspects and aspects that are experienced as internal AND external
>to the individual/collective. A 'morality' is for me synonymous with a
>'static pattern of values'.
ERIN: I agree with this
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:19 BST