RE: MD language-derived

From: enoonan (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 21:49:26 BST


Hey Patrick

I do not think your post was Dooddoener ( I love that word - its
rather onomatopoetic. I think I will start using it)

PATRICK; My addition here is about the notion of the 'unconsciousness'. I
always
>felt and still feel uncomfortable with this notion. That is because we
>only know consciousness. The unconsciousness is (as you say) no more
>conscious when you ... bring it into consciousness. Thus, we can never
>experience the unconsciousness. It is some kind of 'inference' we make.
>

ERIN: Right,I think the inference is that the unconscious
is a separate "part" rather then both being memory.
I think what you are try to express that a separation is a bit of
an illusion.
I think the terms in psychology- working memory and long-term memory express
it well.
 
PATRICK (about emotion and reason in consciousness) They form a
>unity; they are intertwined and their boundaries are vague.

ERIN: I think gestalt idea would work here.
Consciousness is more then just the sum of emotion and reason.
I think that they may have a synergistic relation and
the product (consciousness) is better then either alone.

Erin

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:20 BST