In a message dated 6/26/02 9:55:45 PM GMT Daylight Time, enoonan@kent.edu
writes:
> ERIN: Right the problem is "defining" quality.
> But when you put the University as wanting to "know" quality I think
> you could extend that to Phaedrus.
> Thus my point was that I thought you were confusing defining
> and knowing.
>
Hi Erin,
I understand the Robbins quote. Taken with good grace i assure you! :)
You got me to thinking earlier, and i thank you for that, because very few
postings here get me to thinking!!!
I got to thinking that epistemology is dead?
If classic reality is post Romantic quality and lived in the past, then we
know nothing of reality except that which quality creates - and this is never
NOW?
There is an established movement in philosophy that suggests epistemology is
dead and i shall look into that and report back if you are interested?
Thanks again,
Squonk.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:20 BST