Hi Platt, Marco and all,
PLATT to MARCO:
Your position seems to be "It gets better accidentally on purpose."
Where have I gone wrong?
Platt, I think you have hit the nail on the head. That is one of the
best one-liners I have seen in months, and I say this in all
seriousness.
My understanding of the MoQ is that both "accident" and "purpose" are
platypus words. The reason avid determinists argue with
anti-determinists is that the former don't accept that anything is an
accident, while anti-determinists deny causative purpose.
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 16:06:18 BST