Hi Wim,
W:
I found your 24/8 7:42 -0400 definition of 'free will' helpful:
'free will is the experience of action that is in alignment with one's
definition of one's self'.
I would slightly rephrase it into:
'free will is the experience of correspondence between one's behavior and
one's self-image'.
I reserve the term 'action' for 'motivated behavior'. Motivation is -I
think- not essential to experience free will, but I am not sure about that.
What do you think?
I am not sure either if one can 'define' one's self, either in the sense of
'describing' its limits or in the sense of 'prescribing/creating' it.
R:
I like your rephrasing on all counts. As for the role of motivation, I would
kinda dodge the question and instead divide things on the correspondence
between behavior and self-image. I would guess that motivation could
conceivably fall on either side of the line???
W:
The correspondence between behavior and that 'self-image' is
experienced as 'being true to one's essence, to that what one identifies
with'.
R:
And I would stress that the self-image can shift widely based upon
circumstances and attitude, and that even within the levels that there are
frequently conflicting self-images -- do I dress like my friends tonight [my
cool self] or as my parents want me to dress [my good-family-member self]?
W:
You also wrote:
'free will ... is applied when we sense control/influence of an action'.
'Control' and 'influence' seem to me a bit risky terms however. They seem to
suppose 'causation' instead of its MoQ substitute 'valuing'.
R:
I find the MOQ terminology awkward in common usage.
Thanks for the knowledge!
Rog
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 16:06:23 BST