Re: MD Celebrity status.

From: jhmau (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 18:07:15 BST


On 14/10, 2002 4:23 PM SQUONKSTAIL @ aol.com writes to Win:

Sq: I feel social patterns are in very much point of fact getting in the way of this forum? I began a thread recently called, Celebrity status. Soon afterwards, more threads appeared dealing with the same subject, but no link to me was made? There is too much jostling for celebrity status here, and i have the impression you avoid it to a greater extent than most.

.....Sadly, as i am about to leave the forum, i cannot respond to you ;)

On 14/10, 2002 2:15 PM "zykaine telex" zykaine @ hotmail. com writes:

Quality locked in quality. Have you anything to add? If so, I'd like to take it away from you.

Squonk,

As one who contributed to the Celebrity status thread without linking you to it, I am sorry for being inconsiderate!

I view you as the conscience of MD discuss! I think the questions you have raised and the feelings you have generated are proof of that. I did not consider that if I am going to follow my conscience, I have to acknowledge that it exists. That you are the conscience, I think, is evident! The flame warrior with the most clout is ADMIN.

joe

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:37:58 GMT