From: Steve Peterson (speterson@fast.net)
Date: Thu Oct 17 2002 - 00:52:18 BST
>>
> DMB says:
> I'm not sure we need tons of detail about the social context. People
> who support the status quo are usually not crucified. It seems sufficient to
> know that he was considered a threat to those who were in charge and that he
> excited those who were not in positions of authority.
Steve:
I disagree that all we need to know is that he was considered a threat. We
still don't know what it was that was considered threatening. "Love your
neighbor" for example couldn't have been threatening, and is therefore
irrelevent to the conversation (or is it?)
Which were his teachings that were in conflict with society two thousand
years ago that eventually became successful static latches?
What were his teachings that may have been responses to dynamic quality that
could not latch at the time because they would have been too destructive to
society but we may perhaps be ready for now?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:37:58 GMT