From: jhmau (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Tue Oct 22 2002 - 17:56:28 BST
Hi Horse
On 21 October at 4:07 PM Horse wrote:
> According to the MoQ the world (i.e. reality) is a moral order so all of
our actions are
> part of this moral order and thus any judgement is a moral judgement. A
moral
> judgement is a means of differentiation and assessment. It is not merely
or necessarily a
> condemnation.
>
Are you equating a remembrance of an experience to judgement? In LILA the
Author was dumbfounded by Lila. He didn't know what to make of her? Rigel
had respect for the Author at first, and no respect for Lila. The situation
changed in the course of the story. IMO this was not a change of
experience, but a change of judgement.
I would agree that our memory of an experience reflects the moral order. I
do not agree that all meaning is in a moral order. The dynamic meaning is
certainly in a moral order. The static meaning can be put into any order by
our actions. The certainty necessary for action can be the certainty from
the dynamic of any order, the certainty from trust, or the certainty from
dogma. Reflections on experiencing another are dynamic. IMO judging
another is static. Even our reflections on dynamic experiences can be
confusing, since the description of how we know things has been inadequate
down through history.
joe
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:38:00 GMT