From: Jonathan B. Marder (jonathan.marder@newmail.net)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 23:24:45 BST
Hi everyone,
I find myself agreeing with Horse and Platt: Quality, Judgement and Morality
all go hand in hand - at least that's what I understand the MoQ to say.
On the other hand, I do have some empathy for the antijudgemental position,
as argued by Erin and others, so here is my attempt at some sort of
synthesis:
To judge based only on preconceived (static) ideas or generalizations is at
PREJUDICE.
To judge according to the spirit of the moment (dynamic) is fickle and
whimsical.
I think that both ZAMM and Lila put the case for balance (Classical +
Romantic, Square + Hip, Static + Dynamic). Anything else tends to be
unreasonable.
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:38:02 GMT