From: Peterfabriani@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 25 2002 - 15:58:39 BST
In a message dated 10/25/02 1:03:27 PM GMT Daylight Time,
Elizaphanian@members.v21.co.uk writes:
> Much of my understanding, in this and
> in other fields, stems from my agreement with Alasdair MacIntyre. I think
> what he has to say is compatible with Pirsig - have a look at After Virtue,
> which has now attained the status of a modern classic in philosophy.
>
> Sam
>
Hello Sam, will check out your recommendation. Thanks.
I have been a-ridin' and a-thinkin' and a-ponderin' (On the ponderosa? Ed.)
under the hot Sun of Quality about these exchanges, and i feel we may be in
far more harmonious agreement than is being identified? As i imbibe a cooling
draught of delicious reflection to ease and calm my fevered brow, (Oh for
God's sake get on with it - Ed.) it seems to me that individuals are social
celebrity patterns. Very often mirages but real non the less for that?
We are both saying this? I would say the 'I' is not immediate enough for it
to be a thing and you agree the 'I' is a narrative, so does that mean there
is no 'I' really but it does have an organising social function when believed
to exists?
Peter.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:38:02 GMT