Donny,
Just read your message. I can't believe that you took my mouthings
seriously. I am in awe of your grasp of philosophy. What I know about
philosophy you could put in your eye and not need a kleenex. I have a
literal mind and that stuff just escapes me. If you get past:
God is love.
Love is blind.
Ray Charles is blind.
Therefore Ray Charles is God.
I am totally lost.
That is why I keep gnawing away at a logical (historical) explanation of
the MoQ. Anything else seems a waste of time to me.
You are absolutely correct. Quality is not a mystery to me. It is
perfectly clear and definable. I just can't tell you where it came from or
when it started
I am presently mulling over some ideas about the relationship of the
uncertainly principle to the MoQ and the way that it fits into the scheme
of things. If I don't come a cropper I will soon fit the UP into the
reality picture in a perfectly logical and understandable way. In my
current thinking the UP is the logical basis of all reality and makes
perfect sense. What I want you to do is to tell me why.
Keep doing your thing and I will continue to read your posts with a
perfect lack of understanding but with a great appreciation of your grasp
of philosophy. Ken
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:33 BST